↓ Skip to main content

Internal construct validity of the stress-energy questionnaire in a working population, a cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Internal construct validity of the stress-energy questionnaire in a working population, a cohort study
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-1524-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emina Hadzibajramovic, Gunnar Ahlborg, Anna Grimby-Ekman, Åsa Lundgren-Nilsson

Abstract

Psychosocial stress at work has been recognised as one of the most important factors behind the increase in sick leave due to stress-related mental disorders. It is therefore important to be able to measure perceived work stress in a way that is both valid and reliable. It has been suggested that the Stress-Energy Questionnaire (SEQ) could be a useful tool for measuring mood (stress and energy) at work and it has been used in many Scandinavian studies. The aim of the study is to examine the internal construct validity of the SEQ in a working population and to address measurement issues, such as the ordering of response categories and potential differences in how women and men use the scale - what is termed differential item functioning (DIF).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Unknown 53 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 22%
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 28%
Psychology 8 15%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 12 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2015.
All research outputs
#18,403,994
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,847
of 14,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,592
of 255,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#227
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.