↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of programs for determining temporal-spatial gait variables from instrumented walkway data: PKmas versus GAITRite

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of programs for determining temporal-spatial gait variables from instrumented walkway data: PKmas versus GAITRite
Published in
BMC Research Notes, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-7-542
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thorlene Egerton, Pernille Thingstad, Jorunn L Helbostad

Abstract

Measurement of temporal-spatial gait variables is common in aging research with several methods available. This study investigated the differences in temporal-spatial gait outcomes derived from two different programs for processing instrumented walkway data.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Student > Master 6 12%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Engineering 6 12%
Neuroscience 4 8%
Sports and Recreations 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 10 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2014.
All research outputs
#20,265,771
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,559
of 4,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,196
of 235,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#110
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.