↓ Skip to main content

Can red yeast rice and olive extract improve lipid profile and cardiovascular risk in metabolic syndrome?: a double blind, placebo controlled randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can red yeast rice and olive extract improve lipid profile and cardiovascular risk in metabolic syndrome?: a double blind, placebo controlled randomized trial
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12906-015-0576-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Veronique Verhoeven, Anastasia Van der Auwera, Luc Van Gaal, Roy Remmen, Sandra Apers, Michel Stalpaert, Johan Wens, Nina Hermans

Abstract

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) comprises a spectrum of clinical phenotypes in which dyslipidemia, dysglycemia and hypertension are clustered and where all share a high level of oxidative stress and an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. This study examines the effect of a nutritional supplement combining red yeast rice and olive fruit extract on the lipid profile and on oxidative stress in a population of patients with MetS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 165 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 15%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Other 13 8%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 47 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 59 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2015.
All research outputs
#6,951,616
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,124
of 3,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,276
of 258,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#34
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.