↓ Skip to main content

Radical cyberknife radiosurgery with tumor tracking: an effective treatment for inoperable small peripheral stage I non-small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Hematology & Oncology, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Radical cyberknife radiosurgery with tumor tracking: an effective treatment for inoperable small peripheral stage I non-small cell lung cancer
Published in
Journal of Hematology & Oncology, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/1756-8722-2-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian T Collins, Saloomeh Vahdat, Kelly Erickson, Sean P Collins, Simeng Suy, Xia Yu, Ying Zhang, Deepa Subramaniam, Cristina A Reichner, Ismet Sarikaya, Giuseppe Esposito, Shadi Yousefi, Carlos Jamis-Dow, Filip Banovac, Eric D Anderson

Abstract

Curative surgery is not an option for many patients with clinical stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), but radical radiosurgery may be effective.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 70 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Other 12 16%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Engineering 4 5%
Physics and Astronomy 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2013.
All research outputs
#15,327,280
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#777
of 1,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,017
of 170,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.