↓ Skip to main content

RARE-Bestpractices: a platform for sharing best practices for the management of rare diseases.

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RARE-Bestpractices: a platform for sharing best practices for the management of rare diseases.
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1750-1172-9-s1-o14
Pubmed ID
Authors

D Taruscio, C Morciano, P Laricchiuta, P Mincarone, F Palazzo, C G Leo, S Sabina, R Guarino, J Auld, T Sejersen, D Gavhed, K Ritchie, M Hilton-Boon, J Manson, P G Kanavos, D Tordrup, V Tzouma, Y Le Cam, J Senecat, G Filippini, S Minozzi, C Del Giovane, H Schünemann, J J Meerpohl, B Prediger, L Schell, R Stefanov, G Iskrov, T Miteva-Katrandzhieva, P Serrano-Aguilar, L Perestelo-Perez, M M Trujillo-Martín, J Pérez-Ramos, A Rivero-Santana, A Brand, H van Kranen, K Bushby, A Atalaia, J Ramet, L Siderius, M Posada, I Abaitua-Borda, V Alonso Ferreira, M Hens-Pérez, F J Manzanares

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 52%
Student > Master 3 14%
Lecturer 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 29%
Neuroscience 3 14%
Engineering 2 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 10%
Psychology 2 10%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 3 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2015.
All research outputs
#15,327,280
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,793
of 2,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,083
of 361,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#57
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.