You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The longitudinal course of non-suicidal self-injury and deliberate self-harm: a systematic review of the literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40479-014-0024-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul L Plener, Teresa S Schumacher, Lara M Munz, Rebecca C Groschwitz |
| Abstract |
Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) has been proposed as diagnostic entity and was added to the section 3 of the DSM 5. Nevertheless, little is known about the long-term course of this disorder and many studies have pointed to the fact that NSSI seems to be volatile over time. We aimed to assemble studies providing longitudinal data about NSSI and furthermore included studies using the definition of deliberate self-harm (DSH) to broaden the epidemiological picture. Using a systematic search strategy, we were able to retrieve 32 studies reporting longitudinal data about NSSI and DSH. We furthermore aimed to describe predictors for the occurrence of NSSI and DSH that were identified in these longitudinal studies. Taken together, there is evidence for an increase in rates of NSSI and DSH in adolescence with a decline in young adulthood. With regards to predictors, rates of depressive symptoms and female gender were often reported as predictor for both NSSI and DSH. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Greece | 1 | 20% |
| Mexico | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 413 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 409 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 12% |
| Researcher | 30 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 55 | 13% |
| Unknown | 153 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 127 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 4% |
| Unknown | 166 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,242,057
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation
#35
of 223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,797
of 361,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.