You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of rapid diagnostic test Plasmotec Malaria-3, microscopy, and quantitative real-time PCR for diagnoses of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax infections in Mimika Regency, Papua, Indonesia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12936-015-0615-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Liony Fransisca, Josef Hari Kusnanto, Tri Baskoro T Satoto, Boni Sebayang, ᅟ Supriyanto, Eko Andriyan, Michael J Bangs |
Abstract |
The World Health Organization recommends malaria be diagnosed by standard microscopy or rapid diagnostic test (RDT) before treatment. RDTs have been used with greater frequency in the absence of matching blood slide confirmation in the majority of RDT reported cases in Mimika Regency, Papua Province, Indonesia. Given the importance of RDT in current health system as point-of-care tool, careful validation of RDT product performance for providing accurate malaria diagnosis is critical. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 151 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 34 | 22% |
Researcher | 22 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
Other | 20 | 13% |
Unknown | 43 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 24% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 8% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 5% |
Other | 24 | 16% |
Unknown | 47 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2015.
All research outputs
#20,265,771
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#5,322
of 5,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,521
of 257,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#111
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.