↓ Skip to main content

Classification and prediction of toxicity of chemicals using an automated phenotypic profiling of Caenorhabditis elegans

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Classification and prediction of toxicity of chemicals using an automated phenotypic profiling of Caenorhabditis elegans
Published in
BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40360-018-0208-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shan Gao, Weiyang Chen, Yingxin Zeng, Haiming Jing, Nan Zhang, Matthew Flavel, Markandeya Jois, Jing-Dong J. Han, Bo Xian, Guojun Li

Abstract

Traditional toxicological studies have relied heavily on various animal models to understand the effect of various compounds in a biological context. Considering the great cost, complexity and time involved in experiments using higher order organisms. Researchers have been exploring alternative models that avoid these disadvantages. One example of such a model is the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. There are some advantages of C. elegans, such as small size, short life cycle, well defined genome, ease of maintenance and efficient reproduction. As these benefits allow large scale studies to be initiated with relative ease, the problem of how to efficiently capture, organize and analyze the resulting large volumes of data must be addressed. We have developed a new method for quantitative screening of chemicals using C. elegans. 33 features were identified for each chemical treatment. The compounds with different toxicities were shown to alter the phenotypes of C. elegans in distinct and detectable patterns. We found that phenotypic profiling revealed conserved functions to classify and predict the toxicity of different chemicals. Our results demonstrate the power of phenotypic profiling in C. elegans under different chemical environments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 20%
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 15 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,314,261
of 23,975,876 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
#129
of 460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,766
of 330,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,876 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.