↓ Skip to main content

Aquaporins as diagnostic and therapeutic targets in cancer: How far we are?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aquaporins as diagnostic and therapeutic targets in cancer: How far we are?
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12967-015-0439-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jian Wang, Li Feng, Zhitu Zhu, Minghuan Zheng, Diane Wang, Zhihong Chen, Hongzhi Sun

Abstract

Aquaporins (AQPs) are a family of water channel proteins distributed in various human tissues, responsible for the transport of small solutes such as glycerol, even gas and ions. The expression of AQPs has been found in more than 20 human cancer types and is significantly correlated with the severity of histological tumors and prognosis of patients with cancer. More recent evidence showed that AQPs could also play a role in tumor-associated edema, tumor cell proliferation and migration, and tumor angiogenesis in solid and hematological tumors. Inhibitors of AQPs in tumor cells and microvessels have been suggested as new therapeutic strategies. The present review overviews AQPs structures, expression variation among normal tissues and tumors, AQPs functions and roles in the development of cancer with special focuses on lung, colorectal, liver, brain and breast cancers, and potential AQPs-target inhibitors. We call the special attention to consider AQPs important as diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers. It may be a novel anticancer therapy by the AQPs inhibition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 111 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 18%
Student > Master 20 18%
Student > Bachelor 18 16%
Researcher 17 15%
Other 6 5%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 18 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 18%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 25 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2018.
All research outputs
#6,099,099
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#917
of 3,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,134
of 262,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#14
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.