You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neurology, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12883-015-0292-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Margit Alt Murphy, Carol Resteghini, Peter Feys, Ilse Lamers |
| Abstract |
Although use of standardized and scientifically sound outcome measures is highly encouraged in clinical practice and research, there is still no clear recommendation on which tools should be preferred for upper extremity assessment after stroke. As the aims, objectives and methodology of the existing reviews of the upper extremity outcome measures can vary, there is a need to bring together the evidence from existing multiple reviews. The purpose of this review was to provide an overview of evidence of the psychometric properties and clinical utility of upper extremity outcome measures for use in stroke, by systematically evaluating and summarizing findings from systematic reviews. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
| Singapore | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 378 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 374 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 61 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 12% |
| Researcher | 34 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 7% |
| Other | 70 | 19% |
| Unknown | 84 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 85 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 41 | 11% |
| Engineering | 38 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 51 | 13% |
| Unknown | 91 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2015.
All research outputs
#15,327,280
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#1,482
of 2,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,848
of 259,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#27
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.