You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Factors influencing the implementation of integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) by healthcare workers at public health centers & dispensaries in Mwanza, Tanzania
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-277 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Augustine Kiplagat, Richard Musto, Damas Mwizamholya, Domenica Morona |
Abstract |
Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) was developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations International Children's Fund (UNICEF) and aims at reducing childhood morbidity and mortality in resource-limited settings including Tanzania. It was introduced in 1996 and has been scaled up in all districts in the country. The purpose of this study was to identify factors influencing the implementation of IMCI in the health facilities in Mwanza, Tanzania since reports indicates that the guidelines are not full adhered to by the healthcare workers. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 267 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 66 | 24% |
Researcher | 30 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 22 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 7% |
Other | 41 | 15% |
Unknown | 71 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 25 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Other | 33 | 12% |
Unknown | 79 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2014.
All research outputs
#20,265,771
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#13,883
of 14,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,973
of 224,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#242
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.