You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease increases the risk of intensive care unit admittance and mechanical ventilation use among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a nationwide population-based cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, December 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-015-0849-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chen-Liang Tsai, Yu-Huei Lin, Meng-Ting Wang, Li-Nien Chien, Chii Jeng, Chih-Feng Chian, Wann-Cherng Perng, Chi-Huei Chiang, Hung-Yi Chiou |
Abstract |
Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is common among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients and may have a deleterious effect on COPD prognosis. However, few studies have investigated whether GORD increases the risk of severe outcomes such as intensive care unit (ICU) admittance or mechanical ventilator use among COPD patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 27% |
United States | 2 | 13% |
Italy | 2 | 13% |
Spain | 2 | 13% |
Puerto Rico | 2 | 13% |
Malaysia | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 29 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 28% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
Researcher | 3 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Professor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 10 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2015.
All research outputs
#4,623,149
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,063
of 6,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,415
of 390,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#337
of 550 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 550 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.