↓ Skip to main content

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease increases the risk of intensive care unit admittance and mechanical ventilation use among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a nationwide population…

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease increases the risk of intensive care unit admittance and mechanical ventilation use among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a nationwide population-based cohort study
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-0849-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chen-Liang Tsai, Yu-Huei Lin, Meng-Ting Wang, Li-Nien Chien, Chii Jeng, Chih-Feng Chian, Wann-Cherng Perng, Chi-Huei Chiang, Hung-Yi Chiou

Abstract

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is common among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients and may have a deleterious effect on COPD prognosis. However, few studies have investigated whether GORD increases the risk of severe outcomes such as intensive care unit (ICU) admittance or mechanical ventilator use among COPD patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Canada 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 25 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 36%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 6 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2015.
All research outputs
#3,638,642
of 19,141,916 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,539
of 5,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,789
of 235,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#10
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,141,916 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.