↓ Skip to main content

Barriers and facilitators for participation in health promotion programs among employees: a six-month follow-up study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Barriers and facilitators for participation in health promotion programs among employees: a six-month follow-up study
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-573
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Rongen, Suzan JW Robroek, Wouter van Ginkel, Dennis Lindeboom, Bibiëlle Altink, Alex Burdorf

Abstract

Health promotion programs (HPPs) are thought to improve health behavior and health, and their effectiveness is increasingly being studied. However, participation in HPPs is usually modest and effect sizes are often small. This study aims to (1) gain insight into the degree of participation of employees in HPPs, and (2) identify factors among employees that are associated with both their intention to participate and actual participation in HPPs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 116 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 23 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 17%
Psychology 14 12%
Sports and Recreations 8 7%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 29 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2015.
All research outputs
#15,327,280
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,333
of 14,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,622
of 228,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#224
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.