↓ Skip to main content

Ureteroscopy-assisted retrograde nephrostomy for a large and obstructive renal pelvic stone: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ureteroscopy-assisted retrograde nephrostomy for a large and obstructive renal pelvic stone: a case report
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13256-015-0529-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takashi Kawahara, Hiroki Ito, Hideyuki Terao, Hiroji Uemura, Yoshinobu Kubota, Junichi Matsuzaki

Abstract

We have previously described the use of ureteroscopy-assisted retrograde nephrostomy. However, reaching the target calyx with the ureteroscope is difficult in patients with obstructive renal pelvic stones.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 25%
Arts and Humanities 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Psychology 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2015.
All research outputs
#18,403,994
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#2,258
of 3,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,679
of 255,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#26
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,915 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.