↓ Skip to main content

A new insight in chimeric antigen receptor-engineered T cells for cancer immunotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Hematology & Oncology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
8 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A new insight in chimeric antigen receptor-engineered T cells for cancer immunotherapy
Published in
Journal of Hematology & Oncology, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13045-016-0379-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erhao Zhang, Hanmei Xu

Abstract

Adoptive cell therapy using chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T cells has emerged as a very promising approach to combating cancer. Despite its ability to eliminate tumors shown in some clinical trials, CAR-T cell therapy involves some significant safety challenges, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and "on-target, off-tumor" toxicity, which is related to poor control of the dose, location, and timing of T cell activity. In the past few years, some strategies to avoid the side effects of CAR-T cell therapy have been reported, including suicide gene, inhibitory CAR, dual-antigen receptor, and the use of exogenous molecules as switches to control the CAR-T cell functions. Because of the advances of the CAR paradigm and other forms of cancer immunotherapy, the most effective means of defeating the cancer has become the integration therapy with the combinatorial control system of switchable dual-receptor CAR-T cell and immune checkpoint blockade.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 200 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 16%
Student > Master 28 14%
Researcher 26 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 44 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 22 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 52 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,318,010
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#263
of 1,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,826
of 421,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#6
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.