↓ Skip to main content

Current concepts and future of noninvasive procedures for diagnosing oral squamous cell carcinoma - a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Head & Face Medicine, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 335)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current concepts and future of noninvasive procedures for diagnosing oral squamous cell carcinoma - a systematic review
Published in
Head & Face Medicine, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13005-015-0063-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esam Omar

Abstract

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) has a remarkably high incidence worldwide, and a fairly serious prognosis, encouraging further research into advanced technologies for noninvasive methods of making early diagnoses, ideally in primary care settings. Our purpose was to examine the validity of using advanced noninvasive technologies in diagnosis of OSCC by identifying and evaluating relevant published reports. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched to identify clinical trials and other information published between 1990 and 10 June 2014; the searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE were updated to November 2014. Studies of noninvasive methods of diagnosing OSCC, including oral brush biopsy, optical biopsy, saliva-based oral cancer diagnosis, and others were included. Data were abstracted and evaluated in duplicate for possible relevance on two occasions at an interval of 2 months before being included or excluded. This study identified 163 studies of noninvasive methods for diagnosing OSCC that met the inclusion criteria. These included six studies of oral brush biopsy, 42 of saliva-based oral diagnosis, and 115 of optical biopsy. Sixty nine of these studies were assessed by the modified version of the QUADAS instrument. Saliva-based oral cancer diagnosis and optical biopsy were found to be promising noninvasive methods for diagnosing OSCC. The strength of evidence was rated low for accuracy outcomes because the studies did not report important details required to assess the risk for bias. It is clear that screening for and early detection of cancer and pre-cancerous lesions have the potential to reduce the morbidity and mortality of this disease. Advances in technologies for saliva-based oral diagnosis and optical biopsy are promising pathways for the future development of more effective noninvasive methods for diagnosing OSCC that are easy to perform clinically in primary care settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 161 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 13%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Other 38 23%
Unknown 48 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 40%
Physics and Astronomy 11 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 52 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,077,000
of 23,148,322 outputs
Outputs from Head & Face Medicine
#42
of 335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,429
of 264,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Head & Face Medicine
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,148,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 335 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.