↓ Skip to main content

Self-reported sitting time and physical activity: interactive associations with mental well-being and productivity in office employees

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
299 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Self-reported sitting time and physical activity: interactive associations with mental well-being and productivity in office employees
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-1447-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Puig-Ribera, Iván Martínez-Lemos, Maria Giné-Garriga, Ángel Manuel González-Suárez, Judit Bort-Roig, Jesús Fortuño, Laura Muñoz-Ortiz, Jim McKenna, Nicholas D Gilson

Abstract

Little is known about how sitting time, alone or in combination with markers of physical activity (PA), influences mental well-being and work productivity. Given the need to develop workplace PA interventions that target employees' health related efficiency outcomes; this study examined the associations between self-reported sitting time, PA, mental well-being and work productivity in office employees.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 293 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 17%
Student > Bachelor 48 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 12%
Researcher 20 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 51 17%
Unknown 77 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 12%
Sports and Recreations 33 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 23 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 7%
Other 67 22%
Unknown 85 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 152. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2023.
All research outputs
#268,293
of 25,312,451 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#238
of 16,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,228
of 365,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#4
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,312,451 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.