↓ Skip to main content

Retraction Note: Dysregulation of cell cycle related genes and MicroRNAs distinguish the low- from high-risk of prostate cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic Pathology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retraction Note: Dysregulation of cell cycle related genes and MicroRNAs distinguish the low- from high-risk of prostate cancer
Published in
Diagnostic Pathology, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13000-015-0241-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiling Wen, Rongbing Li, Xiaofei Wen, Guangming Chou, Jiasun Lu, Xuelei Wang, Yongchao Jin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Lecturer 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Linguistics 1 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2017.
All research outputs
#14,219,838
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#420
of 1,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,078
of 263,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#26
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.