↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Meta-analysis on the efficacy of tourniquet on ankle trauma surgery

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Medical Research, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Meta-analysis on the efficacy of tourniquet on ankle trauma surgery
Published in
European Journal of Medical Research, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/2047-783x-18-55
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xinhua Jiang, Baoqing Yu, Wei Qu, Jiawen He

Abstract

In our study, we used meta-analysis to study the efficacy of the tourniquet on ankle trauma surgery. Postoperative infection rate, deep venous thrombosis incidence, hospital stay, and joint range of motion were studied to compare the tourniquet and non-tourniquet groups and provide certain references for clinical decision.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sri Lanka 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Lecturer 3 15%
Librarian 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 4 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2015.
All research outputs
#4,836,164
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Medical Research
#139
of 923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,864
of 320,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Medical Research
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.