↓ Skip to main content

Protective socks for people with diabetes: a systematic review and narrative analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protective socks for people with diabetes: a systematic review and narrative analysis
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13047-015-0068-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon J Otter, Keith Rome, Belinda Ihaka, Andrew South, Mandy Smith, Amit Gupta, Frances Joseph, Peter Heslop

Abstract

Padded socks to protect the at-risk diabetic foot have been available for a number of years. However, the evidence base to support their use is not well known. We aimed to undertake a systematic review of padded socks for people with diabetes. Additionally, a narrative analysis of knitted stitch structures, yarn and fibres used together with the proposed benefits fibre properties may add to the sock. Assessment of the methodological quality was undertaken using a quality tool to assess non-randomised trials. From the 81 articles identified only seven met the inclusion criteria. The evidence to support to use of padded socks is limited. There is a suggestion these simple-to-use interventions could be of value, particularly in terms of plantar pressure reduction. However, the range of methods used and limited methodological quality limits direct comparison between studies. The socks were generally of a sophisticated design with complex use of knit patterns and yarn content. This systematic review provides limited support for the use of padded socks in the diabetic population to protect vulnerable feet. More high quality studies are needed; including qualitative components of sock wear and sock design, prospective randomized controlled trials and analysis of the cost-effectiveness of protective socks as a non-surgical intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 73 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 17%
Lecturer 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 19 25%
Unknown 21 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 16%
Engineering 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 24 32%