↓ Skip to main content

Identifying statistically significant combinatorial markers for survival analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Genomics, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying statistically significant combinatorial markers for survival analysis
Published in
BMC Medical Genomics, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12920-018-0346-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raissa T. Relator, Aika Terada, Jun Sese

Abstract

Survival analysis methods have been widely applied in different areas of health and medicine, spanning over varying events of interest and target diseases. They can be utilized to provide relationships between the survival time of individuals and factors of interest, rendering them useful in searching for biomarkers in diseases such as cancer. However, some disease progression can be very unpredictable because the conventional approaches have failed to consider multiple-marker interactions. An exponential increase in the number of candidate markers requires large correction factor in the multiple-testing correction and hide the significance. We address the issue of testing marker combinations that affect survival by adapting the recently developed Limitless Arity Multiple-testing Procedure (LAMP), a p-value correction technique for statistical tests for combination of markers. LAMP cannot handle survival data statistics, and hence we extended LAMP for the log-rank test, making it more appropriate for clinical data, with newly introduced theoretical lower bound of the p-value. We applied the proposed method to gene combination detection for cancer and obtained gene interactions with statistically significant log-rank p-values. Gene combinations with orders of up to 32 genes were detected by our algorithm, and effects of some genes in these combinations are also supported by existing literature. The novel approach for detecting prognostic markers presented here can identify statistically significant markers with no limitations on the order of interaction. Furthermore, it can be applied to different types of genomic data, provided that binarization is possible.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 42%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 26%
Computer Science 3 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Mathematics 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2018.
All research outputs
#16,885,978
of 24,827,122 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Genomics
#742
of 1,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,278
of 332,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Genomics
#15
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,827,122 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,355 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.