↓ Skip to main content

A high mean arterial pressure target is associated with improved microcirculation in septic shock patients with previous hypertension: a prospective open label study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A high mean arterial pressure target is associated with improved microcirculation in septic shock patients with previous hypertension: a prospective open label study
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-0866-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing-Yuan Xu, Si-Qing Ma, Chun Pan, Hong-Li He, Shi-Xia Cai, Shu-Ling Hu, Ai-Ran Liu, Ling Liu, Ying-Zi Huang, Feng-Mei Guo, Yi Yang, Hai-Bo Qiu

Abstract

The effect of mean arterial pressure (MAP) titration to a higher level on microcirculation in septic shock patients with previous hypertension remains unknown. Our goal is to assess the effect of MAP titration to a higher level on microcirculation in hypertensive septic shock patients. This is a single-center open label study. Hypertensive patients with septic shock for less than 24 hours after adequate fluid resuscitation and requiring norepinephrine to maintain a MAP of 65 mm Hg were enrolled. Then MAP was titrated by norepinephrine from 65 mm Hg to patients' usual level. In addition to hemodynamic variables, sublingual microcirculation was evaluated by sidestream dark field imaging. Nineteen patients were enrolled in the study. Increasing MAP from 65 mm Hg to patients' usual level was associated with increased central venous pressure (from 11 ± 4 to 13 ± 4 mm Hg, p = 0.002), cardiac output (from 5.4 ± 1.4 to 6.4 ± 2.1 l/min, p = 0.001), central venous oxygen saturation (from 81 ± 7 to 83 ± 7%, p = 0.001). There were significant increases of small perfused vessel density (from 10.96 ± 2.98 to 11.99 ± 2.55 vessels/mm(2), p = 0.009), proportion of small perfused vessel (from 85 ± 18 to 92 ± 14%, p = 0.002), and small microvascular flow index (from 2.45 ± 0.61 to 2.80 ± 0.68, p = 0.009) when compared with a MAP of 65 mm Hg. Increasing MAP from 65 mm Hg to patients' usual level is associated with improved microcirculation in hypertensive septic shock patients. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01443494 . Registered 28 November 2011.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 115 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Master 9 8%
Other 28 24%
Unknown 35 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Psychology 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 38 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,189,585
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,936
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,596
of 395,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#142
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.