Title |
Pre-treatment neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio may be a useful tool in predicting survival in early triple negative breast cancer patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Cancer, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12885-015-1204-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mirco Pistelli, Mariagrazia De Lisa, Zelmira Ballatore, Miriam Caramanti, Alessandra Pagliacci, Nicola Battelli, Francesca Ridolfi, Matteo Santoni, Elena Maccaroni, Raffaella Bracci, Alfredo Santinelli, Tommasina Biscotti, Rossana Berardi, Stefano Cascinu |
Abstract |
There is a growing body of evidence that immune response plays a large role in cancer outcome. The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been used as a simple parameter of systemic inflammation in several tumors. The purpose was to investigate the association between pre-treatment NLR, disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with early triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). We reviewed the records of patients with stage I-III TNBC at our Institution from 2006 to 2012. The association between pre-treatment NLR and survival was analyzed. The difference among variables was calculated by chi-square test. DFS and OS were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Cox analysis was performed to analyze clinical parameters for their prognostic relevance. A total of 90 patients were eligible. There was no significant correlation among pre-treatment NLR and various clinical pathological factors. Patients with NLR higher than 3 showed significantly lower DFS (p = 0.002) and OS (p = 0.009) than patients with NLR equal or lower than 3. The Cox proportional multivariate hazard model revealed that higher pre-treatment NLR was independently correlated with poor DFS and OS, with hazard ratio 5.15 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-23.88, p = 0.03) and 6.16 (95% CI 1.54-24.66, p = 0.01) respectively. Our study suggests that pre-treatment NLR may be associated with DFS and OS patients with early TNBC. Further validation and a feasibility study are required before it can be considered for clinical use. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 16% |
Researcher | 11 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 15% |
Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
Other | 14 | 19% |
Unknown | 12 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 49% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 15 | 20% |