↓ Skip to main content

Developing accurate prediction systems for the terrestrial environment

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing accurate prediction systems for the terrestrial environment
Published in
BMC Biology, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12915-018-0515-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

David B. Lindenmayer

Abstract

In recent decades, meteorologists have made remarkable progress in predicting the weather, thereby saving lives and considerable sums of money. However, we are way behind when it comes to predicting the effects of environmental change on ecosystems, even when we are ourselves the agent of such change. Given the substantial environmental problems facing our living planet, and the need to tackle these in an ecologically responsible and cost-effective way, we should aspire to develop terrestrial environmental prediction systems that reach the levels of accuracy and precision which characterize weather prediction systems. I argue here that well designed, long-term monitoring programs will be key to developing robust environmental prediction systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 21%
Other 3 16%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 4 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 16%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 47%