You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Are parental concerns for child TV viewing associated with child TV viewing and the home sedentary environment?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-8-102 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Natalie Pearson, Jo Salmon, David Crawford, Karen Campbell, Anna Timperio |
| Abstract |
Time spent watching television affects multiple aspects of child and adolescent health. Although a diverse range of factors have been found to be associated with young people's television viewing, parents and the home environment are particularly influential. However, little is known about whether parents, particularly those who are concerned about their child's television viewing habits, translate their concern into action by providing supportive home environments (e.g. rules restricting screen-time behaviours, limited access to screen-based media). The aim of this study was to examine associations between parental concerns for child television viewing and child television viewing and the home sedentary environment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 2 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
| Researcher | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 40 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 19% |
| Psychology | 16 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 47 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2012.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#2,034
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,407
of 142,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#26
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.