↓ Skip to main content

External validation of scores proposed for estimation of survival probability of patients with severe adult respiratory distress syndrome undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy: a…

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
External validation of scores proposed for estimation of survival probability of patients with severe adult respiratory distress syndrome undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy: a retrospective study
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-0875-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie Klinzing, Urs Wenger, Peter Steiger, Christoph Thomas Starck, Markus Wilhelm, Reto A Schuepbach, Marco Maggiorini

Abstract

This study was designed as an external validation of the recently proposed PRedicting dEath for SEvere ARDS on V-V ECMO (PRESERVE) score, The Respiratory Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Survival Prediction (RESP) score and a scoring system developed for external retrieved patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) at our institution. All scores are proposed for estimation of survival probability after ECMO treatment for severe adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Data of 51 patients (2008 - 2013) were analyzed in this retrospective single center study. A calculation of an adapted PRESERVE score, the RESP score as well as the score developed for external retrieved ECMO patients was performed. 71% of patients received veno-venous (v-v) and 29% venous-arterial (v-a) ECMO support during the study period. 6-months survival overall was 55% with a 61% survival rate for v-v cannulated patients and a 40% survival rate for v-a cannulated patients. The PRESERVE score discriminated survivors and non-survivors with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.67 (95% CI 0.52 - 0.82, p = 0.03). Analyzing survival prediction according to cannulation modus, the PRESERVE score and the RESP score significantly predicted survival for patients on v-v ECMO with AUC of 0.75 (95% CI 0.57 - 0.92, p = 0.01) and 0.81 (95% CI 0.67 - 0.95, P = 0.035) respectively, while the scoring system developed for external retrieved ECMO patients failed to predict survival in our study population. All scores failed to predict mortality for patients on v-a ECMO. Our single-center validation confirms that the proposed PRESERVE- and RESP-score predict survival for patients treated with v-v ECMO for severe ARDS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Unknown 56 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 21%
Researcher 8 14%
Other 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 78%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2015.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,468
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,671
of 395,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#455
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.