↓ Skip to main content

Effect of a conventional energy-restricted modified diet with or without meal replacement on weight loss and cardiometabolic risk profile in overweight women

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition & Metabolism, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of a conventional energy-restricted modified diet with or without meal replacement on weight loss and cardiometabolic risk profile in overweight women
Published in
Nutrition & Metabolism, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/1743-7075-8-64
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine E Metzner, Anke Folberth-Vögele, Norman Bitterlich, Martin Lemperle, Sandy Schäfer, Birgit Alteheld, Peter Stehle, Roswitha Siener

Abstract

Abdominal obesity, atherogenic dyslipidemia and hypertension are essential risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. Several studies showed favorable effects of weight loss in overweight subjects on cardiometabolic risk profile.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Student > Master 8 15%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Librarian 3 6%
Other 15 28%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 41%
Psychology 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 12 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2015.
All research outputs
#1,507,238
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
#205
of 942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,462
of 180,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
#14
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.