You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The wider determinants of inequalities in health: a decomposition analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal for Equity in Health, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-9276-10-30 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leonie Sundmacher, David Scheller-Kreinsen, Reinhard Busse |
| Abstract |
The common starting point of many studies scrutinizing the factors underlying health inequalities is that material, cultural-behavioural, and psycho-social factors affect the distribution of health systematically through income, education, occupation, wealth or similar indicators of socioeconomic structure. However, little is known regarding if and to what extent these factors can assert systematic influence on the distribution of health of a population independent of the effects channelled through income, education, or wealth. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 37% |
| Colombia | 2 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Panama | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 26% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 25% |
| Unknown | 28 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 29 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 16% |
| Psychology | 12 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,296,532
of 23,578,176 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#386
of 1,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,399
of 183,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#3
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.