↓ Skip to main content

Impact of routine percutaneous coronary intervention after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of routine percutaneous coronary intervention after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation
Published in
Critical Care, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/cc10227
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierrick Cronier, Philippe Vignon, Koceila Bouferrache, Philippe Aegerter, Cyril Charron, François Templier, Samuel Castro, Rami El Mahmoud, Cécile Lory, Nicolas Pichon, Olivier Dubourg, Antoine Vieillard-Baron

Abstract

Since 2003, we have routinely used percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and mild therapeutic hypothermia (MTH) to treat patients < 80 years of age after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) related to ventricular fibrillation. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of routine PCI in association with MTH and the potential influence of age.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Unknown 85 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 19 21%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 24 27%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 69%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 15 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,107,039
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,580
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,583
of 121,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#10
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.