You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Correction to: Long-acting bronchodilators improve exercise capacity in COPD patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Respiratory Research, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12931-018-0764-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fabiano Di Marco, Giovanni Sotgiu, Pierachille Santus, Denis E. O’Donnell, Kai-Michael Beeh, Simone Dore, Maria Adelaide Roggi, Lisa Giuliani, Francesco Blasi, Stefano Centanni |
| Abstract |
In the original publication [1] is an incorrect sentence in the abstract under Conclusions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2018.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#2,510
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,967
of 339,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#57
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.