↓ Skip to main content

Predictive factors of successful microdissection testicular sperm extraction

Overview of attention for article published in Basic and Clinical Andrology, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predictive factors of successful microdissection testicular sperm extraction
Published in
Basic and Clinical Andrology, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/2051-4190-23-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aaron M Bernie, Ranjith Ramasamy, Peter N Schlegel

Abstract

Azoospermia in men requires microsurgical reconstruction or a procedure for sperm retrieval with assisted reproduction to allow fertility. While the chance of successful retrieval of sperm in men with obstructive azoospermia approaches >90%, the chances of sperm retrieval in men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) are not as high. Conventional procedures such as fine needle aspiration of the testis, testicular biopsy and testicular sperm extraction are successful in 20-45% of men with NOA. With microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE), the chance of successful retrieval can be up to 60%. Despite this increased success, the ability to counsel patients preoperatively on their probability of successful sperm retrieval has remained challenging. A combination of variables such as age, serum FSH and inhibin B levels, testicular size, genetic analysis, history of Klinefelter syndrome, history of cryptorchidism or varicocele and histopathology on diagnostic biopsy have provided some insight into the chance of successful sperm retrieval in men with NOA. The goal of this review was to evaluate the preoperative factors that are currently available to predict the outcome for success with micro-TESE.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 13%
Engineering 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 19 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Basic and Clinical Andrology
#126
of 161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,102
of 220,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Basic and Clinical Andrology
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.