You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A genetic predisposition score for muscular endophenotypes predicts the increase in aerobic power after training: the CAREGENE study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomic Data, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2156-12-84 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tom Thomaes, Martine Thomis, Steven Onkelinx, Robert Fagard, Gert Matthijs, Roselien Buys, Dirk Schepers, Véronique Cornelissen, Luc Vanhees |
| Abstract |
It is widely accepted that genetic variability might explain a large part of the observed heterogeneity in aerobic capacity and its response to training. Significant associations between polymorphisms of different genes with muscular strength, anaerobic phenotypes and body composition have been reported. Muscular endophenotypes are positively correlated with aerobic capacity, therefore, we tested the association of polymorphisms in twelve muscular related genes on aerobic capacity and its response to endurance training. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Algeria | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2012.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomic Data
#668
of 1,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,410
of 144,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomic Data
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.