↓ Skip to main content

Comparative effectiveness of silvicultural interventions for increasing timber production and sustaining conservation values in natural tropical production forests. A systematic review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative effectiveness of silvicultural interventions for increasing timber production and sustaining conservation values in natural tropical production forests. A systematic review protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13750-015-0034-7
Authors

Gillian Petrokofsky, Plinio Sist, Lilian Blanc, Jean-Louis Doucet, Bryan Finegan, Sylvie Gourlet-Fleury, John R Healey, Barbara Livoreil, Robert Nasi, Marielos Peña-Claros, Francis E Putz, Wen Zhou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
French Guiana 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 148 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 22%
Researcher 29 19%
Student > Bachelor 26 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 18 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 54 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 32%
Engineering 5 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 3%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 24 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2018.
All research outputs
#3,678,586
of 22,799,071 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#147
of 300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,753
of 264,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,799,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.