You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The problem of pseudoreplication in neuroscientific studies: is it affecting your analysis?
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Neuroscience, January 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2202-11-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stanley E Lazic |
Abstract |
Pseudoreplication occurs when observations are not statistically independent, but treated as if they are. This can occur when there are multiple observations on the same subjects, when samples are nested or hierarchically organised, or when measurements are correlated in time or space. Analysis of such data without taking these dependencies into account can lead to meaningless results, and examples can easily be found in the neuroscience literature. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 11 | 39% |
United Kingdom | 8 | 29% |
Japan | 1 | 4% |
Belgium | 1 | 4% |
Mexico | 1 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 5 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 57% |
Scientists | 10 | 36% |
Unknown | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 659 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 14 | 2% |
Germany | 12 | 2% |
France | 5 | <1% |
Brazil | 5 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
Sweden | 4 | <1% |
Canada | 4 | <1% |
Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
Other | 19 | 3% |
Unknown | 587 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 157 | 24% |
Researcher | 152 | 23% |
Student > Master | 87 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 47 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 5% |
Other | 119 | 18% |
Unknown | 67 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 240 | 36% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 10% |
Neuroscience | 57 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 45 | 7% |
Psychology | 43 | 7% |
Other | 118 | 18% |
Unknown | 93 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,190,026
of 25,489,496 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#20
of 1,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,762
of 174,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,489,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,298 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them