↓ Skip to main content

MicroRNAs enrichment in GWAS of complex human phenotypes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MicroRNAs enrichment in GWAS of complex human phenotypes
Published in
BMC Genomics, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-1513-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luiz F Goulart, Francesco Bettella, Ida E Sønderby, Andrew J Schork, Wesley K Thompson, Morten Mattingsdal, Vidar M Steen, Verena Zuber, Yunpeng Wang, Anders M Dale, PRACTICAL/ELLIPSE consortium, Ole A Andreassen, Srdjan Djurovic

Abstract

The genotype information carried by Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) seems to have the potential to explain more of the 'missing heritability' of complex human phenotypes, given improved statistical approaches. Several lines of evidence support the involvement of microRNA (miRNA) and other non-coding RNA in complex human traits and diseases. We employed a novel, genetic annotation-informed enrichment method for GWAS that captures more polygenic effects than standard GWAS analysis, to investigate if miRNA-tagging Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) are enriched of associations with 15 complex human phenotypes. We then leveraged the enrichment using a conditional False Discovery Rate (condFDR) approach to assess any improvement in the detection of individual miRNA SNPs associated with the disorders. We found SNPs tagging miRNA transcription regions to be significantly enriched of associations with 10 of 15 phenotypes. The enrichment remained significant after controlling for affiliation to other genomic categories, and was confirmed by replication. Albeit only nominally significant, enrichment was found also in miRNA binding sites for 10 phenotypes out of 15. Leveraging the enrichment in the condFDR framework, we observed a 2-4-fold increase in discovery of SNPs tagging miRNA regions. Our results suggest that miRNAs play an important role in the polygenic architecture of complex human disorders and traits, and therefore that miRNAs are a genomic category that can and should be used to improve gene discovery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Qatar 1 2%
Unknown 46 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 21%
Professor 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 9 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,804,128
of 24,224,854 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,596
of 10,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,370
of 241,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#95
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,224,854 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,925 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.