↓ Skip to main content

Transcriptome sequencing reveals CHD1 as a novel fusion partner of RUNX1 in acute myeloid leukemia with t(5;21)(q21;q22)

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cancer, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transcriptome sequencing reveals CHD1 as a novel fusion partner of RUNX1 in acute myeloid leukemia with t(5;21)(q21;q22)
Published in
Molecular Cancer, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12943-015-0353-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hong Yao, Jinlan Pan, Chunxiao Wu, Hongjie Shen, Jundan Xie, Qinrong Wang, Lijun Wen, Qian Wang, Liang Ma, Lili Wu, Nana Ping, Yun Zhao, Aining Sun, Suning Chen

Abstract

RUNX1/AML1, which is a Runt family transcription factor critical for normal hematopoiesis, is frequently mutated or translocated in a broad spectrum of hematopoietic malignancies. We describe here the case of a 54-year-old female developed acute myeloid leukemia with a t(5;21)(q21;q22). Transcriptome sequencing identified the chromodomain-helicase-DNA-binding protein 1 gene, CHD1, as a novel partner gene of RUNX1. Furthermore, the patient was found to harbor FLT3-ITD mutation, which might collaborated with CHD1-RUNX1 in the development of acute myeloid leukemia. We have identified CHD1 as the RUNX1 fusion partner in acute myeloid leukemia with t(5;21)(q21;q22).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2015.
All research outputs
#15,329,087
of 22,799,071 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cancer
#1,043
of 1,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,543
of 264,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cancer
#25
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,799,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.