↓ Skip to main content

Knowledge, perceptions and myths regarding infertility among selected adult population in Pakistan: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
344 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Knowledge, perceptions and myths regarding infertility among selected adult population in Pakistan: a cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-760
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sumera Ali, Raafay Sophie, Ayesha M Imam, Faisal I Khan, Syed F Ali, Annum Shaikh, Syed Farid-ul-Hasnain

Abstract

The reported prevalence of infertility in Pakistan is approximately 22% with 4% primary and 18% secondary infertility. Infertility is not only a medical but also a social problem in our society as cultural customs and perceived religious dictums may equate infertility with failure on a personal, interpersonal, or social level. It is imperative that people have adequate knowledge about infertility so couples can seek timely medical care and misconceptions can be rectified. We aim to assess the knowledge, perception and myths regarding infertility and suggest ways to improve it.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 344 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 339 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 59 17%
Student > Master 53 15%
Researcher 27 8%
Student > Postgraduate 23 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 6%
Other 51 15%
Unknown 111 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 14%
Social Sciences 22 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 4%
Other 39 11%
Unknown 121 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,680,226
of 23,420,064 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,838
of 15,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,163
of 134,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#16
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,420,064 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.