↓ Skip to main content

Signaling by exosomal microRNAs in cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Signaling by exosomal microRNAs in cancer
Published in
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13046-015-0148-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Germana Falcone, Armando Felsani, Igea D’Agnano

Abstract

A class of small non-coding RNAs, the microRNAs (miRNAs), have recently attracted great attention in cancer research since they play a central role in regulation of gene-expression and miRNA aberrant expression is found in almost all types of human cancer. The discovery of circulating miRNAs in body fluids and the finding that they are often tumor specific and can be detected early in tumorigenesis has soon led to the evaluation of their possible use as cancer biomarkers and treatment-response predictors. The evidence that tumor cells communicate via the secretion and delivery of miRNAs packed into tumor-released microvesicles has prompted to investigate miRNA contribution as signaling molecules to the establishment and maintenance of the tumor microenvironment and the metastatic niche in cancer. In this review we highlight the recent advances on the role of exosomal miRNAs as mediators of cancer cell-to-cell communication.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 1%
Finland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 144 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 21%
Researcher 24 16%
Student > Master 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 23 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 27 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2015.
All research outputs
#20,268,102
of 22,799,071 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#1,648
of 2,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,340
of 263,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#16
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,799,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,051 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.