↓ Skip to main content

Time in blood glucose range 70 to 140 mg/dl >80% is strongly associated with increased survival in non-diabetic critically ill adults

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Time in blood glucose range 70 to 140 mg/dl >80% is strongly associated with increased survival in non-diabetic critically ill adults
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-0908-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

James S Krinsley, Jean-Charles Preiser

Abstract

Hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia and increased glucose variability are independently associated with increased risk of death in critically ill adults. The relationship between time in targeted blood glucose range (TIR) and mortality is not well described, and may have been a factor that confounded the results of the major interventional trials of intensive insulin therapy. This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data, involving 3,297 patients with intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) at least 1.0 day admitted between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2013 to a single mixed medical surgical ICU. We investigated the relationship between TIR 70-140 mg/dL with mortality, and compared outcomes of non-diabetics (NON) and diabetics (DM), including stratifying by TIR above (TIR hi) and below (TIR lo) the median value for NON and DM. There were 85,799 BG values for NON and 32,651 for DM; 75.5% and 54.8% were between 70-140 (p < 0.0001). The median (IQR) TIR (%) for NON and DM were 80.6 (61.4-94.0) and 55.0 (35.5-71.1) (p < 0.0001). For NON, mortality was 8.47% and 15.71% for TIR hi and TIR lo (p < 0.0001). For DM moratlity was 16.09% and 14.44% for TIR Hi and TIR lo (p = NS). We observed similar relationships for NON when we stratified by ICU length of stay (LOS) or severity of illness, especially in the most severely ill. There was a cumulative interaction of indices of hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia or glucose variability with TIR. Multivariable analysis demonstrated, for NON, that TIR hi was independently associated with increased survival (p = 0.0009). For NON, the observed:expected mortality ratios for TIR hi and TIR lo, using Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV methodology, were 0.53 and 0.78. In contrast, among DM there was no clear relationship between TIR 70-140 mg/dL and survival. Time in BG range 70-140 mg/dL > 80% is strongly associated with survival in critically ill non-diabetic patients, independently of ICU LOS and severity of illness. These findings have implications for the design of clinical protocols for glycemic control in the critically ill as well for the design of future interventional trials of intensive insulin therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 131 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 16%
Other 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Student > Master 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 38 28%
Unknown 30 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Engineering 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 35 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2017.
All research outputs
#14,913,921
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,912
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,482
of 395,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#411
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.