↓ Skip to main content

Validity and usefulness of members reports of implementation progress in a quality improvement initiative: findings from the Team Check-up Tool (TCT)

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validity and usefulness of members reports of implementation progress in a quality improvement initiative: findings from the Team Check-up Tool (TCT)
Published in
Implementation Science, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-6-115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kitty S Chan, Yea-Jen Hsu, Lisa H Lubomski, Jill A Marsteller

Abstract

Team-based interventions are effective for improving safety and quality of healthcare. However, contextual factors, such as team functioning, leadership, and organizational support, can vary significantly across teams and affect the level of implementation success. Yet, the science for measuring context is immature. The goal of this study is to validate measures from a short instrument tailored to track dynamic context and progress for a team-based quality improvement (QI) intervention.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 95 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 7 7%
Other 26 26%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 21%
Psychology 8 8%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 23 23%