↓ Skip to main content

Do larger genomes contain more diverse transposable elements?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do larger genomes contain more diverse transposable elements?
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12862-015-0339-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tyler A Elliott, T Ryan Gregory

Abstract

The genomes of eukaryotes vary enormously in size, with much of this diversity driven by differences in the abundances of transposable elements (TEs). There is also substantial structural and phylogenetic diversity among TEs, such that they can be classified into distinct classes, superfamilies, and families. Possible relationships between TE diversity (and not just abundance) and genome size have not been investigated to date, though there are reasons to expect either a positive or a negative correlation. This study compares data from 256 species of animals, plants, fungi, and "protists" to determine whether TE diversity at the superfamily level is related to genome size. No simple relationship was found between TE diversity and genome size. There is no significant correlation across all eukaryotes, but there is a positive correlation for genomes below 1,000Mbp and a negative correlation among land plants. No relationships were found across animals or within vertebrates. Some TE superfamilies tend to be present across all major groups of eukaryotes, but there is considerable variance in TE diversity in different taxa. Differences in genome size are thought to arise primarily through accumulation of TEs, but beyond a certain point (~500Mbp), TE diversity does not increase with genome size. Several possible explanations for these complex patterns are discussed, and recommendations to facilitate future analyses are provided.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Brazil 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 145 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 21%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 25 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 20%
Computer Science 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 33 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,597,191
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#927
of 3,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,777
of 280,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#23
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.