↓ Skip to main content

Objective assessment of health or pre-chronic disease state based on a health test index derived from routinely measured clinical laboratory parameters

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Objective assessment of health or pre-chronic disease state based on a health test index derived from routinely measured clinical laboratory parameters
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12967-015-0487-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sun Wenping, Liu Ying, Leng Song, Li Yuzhong, Liu Hui

Abstract

To develop a quantitative system to enable the objective assessment of health or pre-chronic disease state. On the basis of measured values and reference ranges, we obtained the organ function index (mean of the cut-off ratios of albumin and creatinine), blood lipid index (mean of the cut-off ratios of triglycerides, cholesterol, high-density lipoproteins and low-density lipoproteins), stress index (mean of the cut-off ratios of neutrophils and glucose), and the health test index (mean of the above three indexes, HTI). Elderly populations, individuals with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and administrators were included in the groups of observed subjects to verify the organ function index, blood lipid index and stress index. The scores of the three indexes were all statistically higher in the observed group than in the control group (p < 0.05). The mean HTI score was 0.7 ± 0.07 and was normally distributed in the control population. The rates of hypertension, obesity, fatty liver disease and health (undetectable organic diseases) increased with increasing HTI scores in a random population. The HTI is easily derived from routinely measured clinical laboratory parameters. It can reflect the health status of an individual and may be a useful tool for the quantitative differentiation of health status.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 21%
Student > Master 3 16%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2015.
All research outputs
#15,330,127
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2,233
of 3,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,751
of 265,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#59
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.