↓ Skip to main content

Malaria-related ideational factors and other correlates associated with intermittent preventive treatment among pregnant women in Madagascar

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Malaria-related ideational factors and other correlates associated with intermittent preventive treatment among pregnant women in Madagascar
Published in
Malaria Journal, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12936-018-2308-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Grace N. Awantang, Stella O. Babalola, Hannah Koenker, Kathleen A. Fox, Michael Toso, Nan Lewicky

Abstract

The Malagasy Ministry of Health aimed to achieve 80% coverage of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria among pregnant women (IPTp) in targeted districts by 2015. However, IPTp coverage rates of have remained fairly static over the past few years. During a cross-sectional household survey, mothers of children under the age of 2 years were asked about their most recent pregnancy. The primary outcome of interest was a mother receiving two or more doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) (IPTp2) during their last pregnancy, at least one of which was obtained from a health provider. Multilevel analysis was used to account for community-level factors. Correlates included exposure to communication messages, the number of antenatal care (ANC) visits made by the woman, her household wealth, and other sociodemographic characteristics. Over one-tenth (11.7%) of women received two or more doses of SP, at least one of which was obtained during an ANC visit. Two-thirds (68.3%) of women who consulted a health provider but did not take IPTp attributed this to not being offered the medication by their health provider. The odds of a woman receiving IPTp2 varied with her knowledge, attitudes, and perceived social norms related to IPTp and ANC and exposure to malaria messages. General malaria ideation, specifically the perceived severity of and perceived susceptibility to malaria, however, was not associated with increased odds of receiving IPTp2. A large variation in the odds of receiving IPTp2 was due to community-level factors that the study did not examine. Health communication programmes should aim to improve IPTp/ANC-specific ideation, particularly the norms of seeking regular care during pregnancy and taking any prescribed medication. While ANC attendance is necessary, it was not sufficient to meet IPTp2 coverage. Women surveyed in Madagascar rely on health providers to prescribe SP according to national policy. At the same time, stock-outs prevent health providers from prescribing SP. The large observed community-level variation in IPTp2 coverage is likely due to supply-side factors, such as SP availability and health-provider ideation and practices.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 18%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 34 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 13%
Design 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Other 25 23%
Unknown 41 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,500,120
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,873
of 5,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,185
of 326,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#45
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.