You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Long-term survival of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension recovering to World Health Organization functional class I or II: a historical comparison between intravenous epoprostenol and oral agents
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Research Notes, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-7-359 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Koji Yamamoto, Yutaka Takeda, Yasuko Takeda, Taio Naniwa, Hitomi Narita, Nobuyuki Ohte |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 22% |
Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 30% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2015.
All research outputs
#17,754,724
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#2,828
of 4,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,017
of 228,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#54
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.