↓ Skip to main content

Primary cilia modulate balance of canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling responses in the injured kidney

Overview of attention for article published in Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Primary cilia modulate balance of canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling responses in the injured kidney
Published in
Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13069-015-0024-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shoji Saito, Björn Tampe, Gerhard A Müller, Michael Zeisberg

Abstract

While kidney injury is associated with re-expression of numerous Wnt ligands and receptors, molecular mechanisms which underlie regulation of distinct Wnt signaling pathways and ensuing biological consequences remain incompletely understood. Primary cilia are increasingly being recognized as cellular 'antennae' which sense and transduce signals from the microenvironment, particularly through Wnt signaling. Here, we explored the role of cilia as modulators of canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling activities involving tubular epithelial cells in the injured kidney. We demonstrate that in the mouse model of unilateral ureter obstruction, progression of kidney injury correlates with increased expression of numerous Wnt ligands, and that increased expression of Wnt ligands corresponded with over-activation of canonical Wnt signaling. In contrast, non-canonical Wnt signaling dropped significantly during the course of kidney injury despite gradually increased expression of typical non-canonical and intermediate Wnt signaling ligands. We further demonstrate that in cultured tubular epithelial cells, cilia modulate balance between canonical and non-canonical signaling responses upon exposure to Wnt ligands. We provide evidence that in the context of renal injury, primary cilia act as molecular switches between canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling activity, possibly determining between regenerative and pro-fibrotic effects of Wnt re-expression in the injured kidney.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Other 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 12%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,457,701
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair
#34
of 83 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,926
of 237,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.