↓ Skip to main content

Re-imagining malaria – a platform for reflections to widen horizons in malaria control

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Re-imagining malaria – a platform for reflections to widen horizons in malaria control
Published in
Malaria Journal, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12936-015-0703-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susanna Hausmann-Muela, Julian Eckl

Abstract

Ongoing political-economic discussions that take stock of social and societal determinants of health present an opportunity for productive dialogue on why current approaches to malaria control and elimination need to be broadened, and how this may be accomplished. They invite us, for example, to look beyond malaria as a disease, to appreciate the experiences of malaria-afflicted populations, to transcend techno-centric approaches, to investigate social conflicts around malaria, to give voice to the communities engaged in bottom-up approaches, and to revisit lessons learned in the past.While contributions from all disciplines are invited to this discussion, social scientists are particularly encouraged to participate. They have struggled in the past to find an appropriate platform within the malaria community that provides them the opportunity to address researchers from other disciplines, malaria practitioners, and policy makers. The Malaria Journal's new thematic series on 're-imagining malaria' offers them this opportunity. The goal of the series is to encourage transdisciplinary thinking, to stimulate discussion, to promote constructive criticism, and to gather overlooked experiences that help to reflect on implicit assumptions. Overall it aims at widening horizons in malaria control.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 54 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Master 12 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 27%
Social Sciences 9 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 14%
Environmental Science 4 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2015.
All research outputs
#19,305,317
of 24,580,204 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#5,042
of 5,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,289
of 269,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#89
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,580,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.