You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pairing virtual reality with dynamic posturography serves to differentiate between patients experiencing visual vertigo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, July 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-4-24 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily A Keshner, Jefferson Streepey, Yasin Dhaher, Timothy Hain |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 18% |
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 8 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2015.
All research outputs
#15,330,127
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#834
of 1,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,895
of 68,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.