↓ Skip to main content

Natural cutaneous anthrax infection, but not vaccination, induces a CD4+ T cell response involving diverse cytokines

Overview of attention for article published in Cell & Bioscience, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Natural cutaneous anthrax infection, but not vaccination, induces a CD4+ T cell response involving diverse cytokines
Published in
Cell & Bioscience, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13578-015-0011-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca J Ingram, Stephanie Ascough, Catherine J Reynolds, Gökhan Metan, Mehmet Doganay, Les Baillie, Diane E Williamson, John H Robinson, Bernard Maillere, Rosemary J Boyton, Daniel M Altmann

Abstract

Whilst there have been a number of insights into the subsets of CD4(+) T cells induced by pathogenic Bacillus anthracis infections in animal models, how these findings relate to responses generated in naturally infected and vaccinated humans has yet to be fully established. We describe the cytokine profile produced in response to T cell stimulation with a previously defined immunodominant antigen of anthrax, lethal factor (LF), domain IV, in cohorts of individuals with a history of cutaneous anthrax, compared with vaccinees receiving the U.K. licenced Anthrax Vaccine Precipitated (AVP) vaccine. We found that immunity following natural cutaneous infection was significantly different from that seen after vaccination. AVP vaccination was found to result in a polarized IFNγ CD4+ T cell response, while the individuals exposed to B. anthracis by natural infection mounted a broader cytokine response encompassing IFNγ, IL-5, -9, -10, -13, -17, and -22. Vaccines seeking to incorporate the robust, long-lasting, CD4 T cell immune responses observed in naturally acquired cutaneous anthrax cases may need to elicit a similarly broad spectrum cellular immune response.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Lecturer 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 8 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 23%
Chemical Engineering 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 9 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,457,701
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from Cell & Bioscience
#184
of 927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,984
of 265,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell & Bioscience
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 927 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.