↓ Skip to main content

Histological antiphospholipid-associated nephropathy versus lupus nephritis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: an observational cross-sectional study with longitudinal follow-up

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Histological antiphospholipid-associated nephropathy versus lupus nephritis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: an observational cross-sectional study with longitudinal follow-up
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13075-015-0614-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jakob Gerhardsson, Birgitta Sundelin, Agneta Zickert, Leonid Padyukov, Elisabet Svenungsson, Iva Gunnarsson

Abstract

Renal involvement is a severe complication in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Moreover, a subset of SLE patients develop the anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS), characterised by the occurrence of anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL) in combination with macro- and microvascular thrombotic manifestations, including acute and chronic antiphospholipid associated nephropathy (APLN). Clinical presentations of lupus nephritis and APLN are similar and a renal biopsy is necessary to differ between the conditions. Our aim with this study was to investigate the occurrence of histopathological findings consistent with APLN (hAPLN) in renal biopsies from SLE patients and to investigate associations with aPL specificities, clinical manifestations, HLA-DRB1 alleles and long term renal outcome. Consecutive renal biopsies from 112 SLE patients with renal involvement were investigated and evaluated for findings of hAPLN, in all 236 renal biopsies. Data from biopsy reports and clinical information were collected. Autoantibodies against cardiolipin (aCL) and β2glykoprotein1 (β2GP1) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Lupus anticoagulant (LA) test was determined with a modified Dilute Russel Viper Venom method. HLA genotyping was performed by sequence-specific primer-polymerase chain reaction. Renal outcome was determined at study end. The prevalence of hAPLN was 14.3 % among SLE patients with renal involvement. Compared to patients with pure lupus nephritis (LN), occurrence of hAPLN was associated with intima changes (OR = 24, CI:3.0-189.8, p < 0.0001), hypertensive vascular changes (OR:7.8, CI:1.6-39.4, p = 0.01), inflammatory infiltrates (OR = 6.5, CI:1.7-25.1, p = 0.007) and tubular atrophy (OR = 13.1, CI:1.7-103.6, p = 0.002). hAPLN was associated with the presence of aCL antibodies (OR = 3.3, CI:1.0-10.8, p = 0.05) and triple aPL positivity (OR = 4.2, CI:1.3-13.7, p = 0.02). Patients with hAPLN were more hypertensive (OR = 3.8, CI:1.2-12.3, p = 0.03) and had higher levels of creatinine as compared to LN (median 116 vs 75 μmol/L, p < 0.0001). We found significantly higher frequency of HLA-DRB1*13 (OR = 5.1, CI:1.7-15.4, p = 0.03) and development of end stage renal disease (ESRD) (OR = 5.8, CI:1.7-19.7, p = 0.008) in hAPLN in comparison to LN. hAPLN is a severe and often unrecognized condition in SLE patients with renal involvement. We have demonstrated an increased risk for development of renal impairment and a genetic predisposition in hAPLN patients compared to LN patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 8 23%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2015.
All research outputs
#3,622,206
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#819
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,385
of 279,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#21
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.