You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-015-0031-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alison O’Mara-Eves, James Thomas, John McNaught, Makoto Miwa, Sophia Ananiadou |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 7 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
| Psychology | 3 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 9 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2015.
All research outputs
#4,173,376
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#873
of 1,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,220
of 264,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#17
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.